Untoro,, Sigit. (2020) MISPRONUNCIATION OF ENGLISH FRICATIVES AND AFFRICATES PRODUCED BY ENGLISH STUDENTS OF STIKUBANK UNIVERSITY. Undergraduate thesis, UNIVERSITAS STIKUBANK.
![[img]](http://eprints.unisbank.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF (HLM JUDUL)
Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (ABSTRAK)
Download (268kB) |
|
PDF (BAB I)
Download (547kB) |
|
PDF (BAB II)
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (686kB) |
|
PDF (BAB III)
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (769kB) |
|
PDF (BAB IV)
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (648kB) |
|
PDF (BAB V)
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (464kB) |
|
PDF (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
Download (1MB) |
|
PDF (LAMPIRAN)
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
Abstract
This Final Project is entitled “Mispronunciation of English Fricatives and Affricates Produced by English Students of Stikubank University”. The objectives of the study are to find out the differences and similarities between Indonesian and English Fricatives and affricates. Besides, the research aims to find out the fricatives and affricates which final semester students deem to be difficult to pronounce. This research focused on fricatives and affricates deviation hich covers six (6) categories of fricatives and ffricates, they are labiodental fricatives [f, v], dental fricatives [θ ð], alveolar fricatives [s, z],palato-alveolar fricative [ʃ ʒ], glottal fricative [h], and palate-alveolar affricates [tʃ ʤ]. The descriptive qualitative was used to process the data which means the data were explained descriptively. The researcher has several steps to analyze the data; listening, transcribing, the last is stating the interference and interlanguage based on the theories of interferences proposed by Lado (1964),Saville (1971), Richards and Stenson (1978), Ellis (2006), and interlanguage theory by Ellis (1994). The research found there are six (6) fricatives and affricates which are absent in Indonesian phonetics, they are [v, θ, ð, ʒ, ʧ, ʤ], and there are five (5) English fricatives that are similar with Indonesian fricatives, they are [f, s, z, ʃ, h]. In analyzing the data, the results show that the respondents failed to pronounce three (3) fricatives based on the deviation scores were above 50%, they are labiodental fricatives [v] the deviation is 65%, dental fricative [θ] with deviation 80% and palate-alveolar fricative [ʒ] is 68,3%. Other fricatives and affricates such as [f, ð, s, z, ʃ, h, tʃ, ʤ] were not difficult to be pronounced by the respondents shown by the total deviations which were less than 50%.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Undergraduate) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | NIM:16.03.52.0009 SKR.III.05.01.0701 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Phonology, Phonetics, Fricatives and Affricates, Interference, Interlanguage. |
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General) |
| Faculty / Institution: | Fakultas Bahasa dan Ilmu Budaya |
| Depositing User: | Ani Mariawati |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Sep 2020 08:58 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Sep 2020 08:58 |
| URI: | https://eprints.unisbank.ac.id/id/eprint/7087 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
